Conventional or addressable - the difference that matters
A conventional fire alarm system divides a building into zones. Each zone is a loop of detectors wired back to the panel, and when any detector operates the panel tells you the zone, not the device. In a small building with four zones that is perfectly adequate: you know the alarm is in the packing shed and you can see the whole shed from the door.
An addressable system gives every detector a unique identity on the loop. The panel tells you it is detector 34 in the finished goods store, first floor, north end. On a large or subdivided site this is the difference between responding immediately and searching a zone while a fire develops.
Addressable systems also monitor themselves properly. The panel knows if a detector has been removed, is dirty, or has drifted out of calibration, and reports it as a fault rather than silently failing. On a conventional system a detector that has clogged with dust simply stops working and nobody finds out until the commissioning test twelve months later.
Wiring differs too. Addressable loops can be wired as a loop returning to the panel, so a single cable break does not disable the devices beyond it. For any site above a modest size, or anywhere with dusty processes, we recommend addressable and will explain the cost difference honestly.